68 Year Old Male With 12.5 Hemoglobin Reading

  • Review
  • Open Access
  • Published:

The effect of vitamin D supplementation on hemoglobin concentration: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • 30k Accesses

  • 16 Citations

  • viii Altmetric

  • Metrics details

A Correction to this article was published on 05 March 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Aims

The purpose of this review was to investigate the issue of vitamin D supplements on hemoglobin concentration in subjects aged 17.five–68 years old; using randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods

Relevant RCT studies were identified from January 2000 to Jan 2019 past using MeSH terms in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinical trials, Scopus databases and gray literature. The studies were reviewed systematically, and quality assessments were evaluated by the guidelines of the Cochrane risk of bias. The upshot of vitamin D supplements (n = xiv) on hemoglobin concentration was considered as primary outcome, while its furnishings on the levels of ferritin, transferrin saturation and iron status were derived every bit secondary outcomes. In total, 1385 subjects with age range of 17.v to 68 years old were examined for iii h to 6 months; Mean (standard deviation) or median interquartile changes in the hemoglobin concentration in each handling grouping was recorded for meta-analysis.

Results

14 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Electric current study findings propose that vitamin D supplementation leads to a non-meaning reduction in hemoglobin levels in subjects (17.5–68 years former) [std. mean deviation (SMD): 0.01; 95% CI: − 0.28, 0.29; P = 0.95], as well it has no significant effect on ferritin concentrations [std. hateful difference (SMD): -0.01; 95% CI: [− 0.xx, 0.18; P = 0.91]. However, vitamin D supplementation demonstrated positive effects on transferrin saturation [mean difference (Medico): i.54; 95% CI: 0.31, two.76; P = 0.01] and iron status [std. hateful difference (SMD): 0.24; 95% CI: − 0.09, 0.39; P = 0.002].

Conclusion

Current review concluded that supplementation with vitamin D had no pregnant outcome on hemoglobin and ferritin levels while positive effects on transferrin saturation and iron status were observed. Farther clinical studies are required to determine the bodily result of this intervention on hemoglobin levels.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Anemia is one of the most prevalent health issues worldwide. Information technology is believed that this disease is responsible for a large portion of the fiscal burdens on communities [one, ii]. Iron deficiency is the most common grade of the illness and occurs in over 50% of patients worldwide. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), more than than one billion people are currently suffering from iron deficiency [i, 3, 4]. Several atmospheric condition, such as gastrointestinal illness, chronic center disease (CHD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and inflammatory diseases increase the risk of anemia [5,6,seven,8,9,10,xi,12,xiii]. Information technology is believed that these conditions could decrease the quality of life equally well equally causing keen impairments in cognitive functions and increase the prevalence of fatigue and other physical dysfunctions [14,fifteen,16,17,eighteen]. As a consequence, attempts to improve the prevention and handling of anemia or the use of potential therapies can help to reduce the brunt of this disease [xix].

Vitamin D is a fat soluble vitamin that tin can be acquired from regimen (ergocalciferol from constitute sterols) and exist synthesized from direct exposure to sunlight (cholecalciferol) [20]. This vitamin is hydroxylated as 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) in the liver and and then converted to its concluding form, Calcitriol (ane, 25 (OH) 2nd), in the kidney cells [20, 21]. Vitamin D appears to be associated with the prevention of chronic disease and modulation of immunity, the regulation of cellular growth, and the differentiation and induction of erythropoiesis in bone marrow cells [22,23,24,25]. Several observational studies have indicated that there is a reverse relationship between vitamin D levels and anemia in adults [25,26,27,28]. Calcitriol (i,25-hydroxyvitamin D) could stimulate erythrocyte precursor cell receptors, which promotes the erythroid progenitor cells maturation and proliferation [29]. Information technology has also been reported that anti-inflammatory effects of vitamin D could downwards regulate mRNA expression of hepcidin levels [30]. The antimicrobial hepcidin peptides are believed to be associated with absorption and release of iron through suppression and activation of ferroportin (cellular fe exporter) [30]. Therefore, amending in iron status and prevalence of anemia are expected. According to a previous study, elevated levels of PTH may exist related to the chance of developing anemia through reduction in erythropoiesis rate, however it is suggested that vitamin D may increase the production of erythropoietin [29]. A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs were carried out in an attempt to summarize the show on the effects of vitamin D interventions on atomic number 26 status (ferritin, Hemoglobin, serum transferrin, transferrin saturation, serum iron and TIBC) and also evaluate the heterogeneity among said RCT results in subjects aged ≥17.5 years old.

Materials and methods

Search strategy

This review was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Notably, PRISMA is primarily used for preparing systematic reviews of such research interventions [31, 32]. The search terms were carried out in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases by two independent investigators, and relevant publications cited from Jan 2000 to Jan 2019 were identified. The post-obit search terms were used: vitamin D, 25-hydroxy vitamin D, 1, 25-hydroxy vitamin D, ergocalciferol, cholecalciferol, calcitriol, anemia, atomic number 26 deficiency, hemoglobin, ferritin, transferrin, iron regulation and iron status. Only articles in English language and simply RCTs that were chronologically limited were considered. The titles and abstracts of the scanned articles were checked, and duplicate citations were then removed. After excluding non-relevant articles, full text of the selected articles (RCTs) were retrieved.

Study choice

Inclusion criteria

A structured approach was taken to set up the research question nearly this review, using the following 5 components that are commonly known as the Participants, Interventions, Comparisons, Outcomes, and Study Design Arroyo (PICOS) [33]:

  1. 1.

    Studies reporting the effects of vitamin D interventions on atomic number 26 status as primary or secondary outcomes from single or combined vitamin D supplementation with calcium, atomic number 26 and vitamin M were considered. No restrictions were placed on the gender, historic period, race, and geographical distribution of the individuals enrolled in the report.

  2. two.

    Oral vitamin D supplements; such as Cholecalciferol, Ergocalciferol and Calcitriol.

  3. iii.

    Studies carried out in subjects with mean age of ≥17.5 years quondam.

  4. iv.

    Study design: RCTs.

Exclusion criteria

  1. 1.

    Editorials, case reports, letters to the editor, review articles, and animal studies.

  2. 2.

    RCTs without evaluating fe status as their primary or secondary outcomes; or RCT studies with no controls.

  3. 3.

    RCTs that did not study hateful (SD) or median interquartile changes in hemoglobin, ferritin levels, transferrin saturation and serum iron levels in each grouping.

Data extraction

2 researchers completed the data extraction independently (AM and LM) where qualitative and quantitative information were extracted from each study. Any disagreement between the researchers with respect to the inclusion criteria of a study was resolved by the insight of a 3rd researcher (AN). P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically meaning for all of the included RCT studies. The information that were extracted included the name of showtime author, year of publication, land of origin, study design, sample size, subjects' age, serum vitamin D baseline levels, dose and types of vitamin D supplements, primary written report outcomes, and conclusions.

Quality and adventure of bias

The quality of each written report was evaluated independently by two researchers (AN and MV) who used bias tool method in the guidelines of Cochrane Collaboration [34]. In accordance with this method, each report was evaluated and proficient quality was obtained when the total depression chance of bias was ≥iii out of 5 items; however, if the total low risk of bias was ≤2 out of 5 items, it was considered as fair quality; and studies with ≤i low risk of bias out of 5 items were regarded every bit poor quality [34].

Statistical analysis

In the current review, all the statistical assay was performed on RevMan five.3 software (Cochrane IMS, Oxford, Great britain) with a random and fixed outcome model. Random effect model was used for random variances, when the number of studies entered was limited and in that location was a divergence between the number and characteristics of the individuals [35]. Small and large sample sizes had the aforementioned effect in the final conclusion when using this model. The stock-still issue model was used for studies with fixed parameters or non-random quantities. Nosotros extracted and accumulated continuous data from all RCTs, then analyzed the variables in guild to obtain overall weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by the inverse variance approach. The heterogeneity by Cochrane I2 value was calculated with weighted Mantele-Haenszel method equally information technology was suggested in Cochrane handbook [36]. In trials with several elapsing of supplementations, mean and standard deviations were analysed separately. Publication bias was evaluated according to the Begg and Egger exam, by using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) V2 software (Biostat, NJ) [37, 38]. It was considered statistically meaning if P value was less than 0.05.

Subgroup analysis

Predetermined subgroup analyses were performed according to Deeks et al. [39] study, to evaluate the potential effects of vitamin D interventions on participants with unlike health conditions. In this method, studies were explored according to the potential heterogeneity of inducer factors, thus divide statistical analyses were performed in each study subgroups. Thereafter, studies were categorized according to the health status of individuals, and then separate meta-analysis was conducted. A pregnant reduction in the extent of heterogeneity in each subgroup, confirmed the heterogeneity in the health status of individuals. We categorized subjects in RCTs to 7 groups as such: good for you adults, bloodless patients, chronic kidney disease patients, centre failure patients, hypertensive patients, critically ill patients and athletes. The levels of hemoglobin and ferritin in participants from these groups were assessed and compared when supplemented with vitamin D.

Results

PRISMA menstruation diagram in Fig. 1, illustrates the pick of included studies and screening process in this review. In total, 3510 articles were establish in the initial search, and 3496 of these articles were excluded after reading the titles and abstracts where supplementation of interest was not evaluated. Also, duplicates were removed. Finally, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria (Additional file 1: Table S1) and were suitable for quantitative synthesis [forty,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,l,51,52,53].

Fig. i
figure 1

PRISMA flow-diagram of the study selection process

Full size prototype

Study characteristics

All studies except two were parallel double blind randomized clinical trials [45, 48]. The primary characteristics of the studies are illustrated in Table 1. Studies were published online betwixt 2014 and 2019. The range of sample size was from 10 to 276 participants. Cholecalciferol was the main form of vitamin D that were supplemented in these studies. The duration of supplementation with vitamin D also varied from 3 h to 6 months [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,l,51,52,53].

Table one Randomized studies comparison the effect of vitamin D supplementation on iron status

Full size table

Participant characteristics

The average historic period of participants ranged from 17.5 to 68 years quondam. Males made upwards more than 50% of participant's gender distribution. Mean baseline of 25 (OH) D levels ranged between ten and thirty ng/ml, as reported in 14 studies (Table 1).

Intervention characteristics

Different types of vitamin D were used in these studies, iv studies received vitamin D fortified food with cholecalciferol [40, 46,47,48], eight studies received oral vitamin D (cholecalciferol) supplements [42, 44, 45, 49,fifty,51,52,53] and in one study subjects were supplemented with ergocalciferol and another one with calcitriol [41, 43]. The minimum vitamin D dosage was 20 IU and maximum was 500,000 IU co-ordinate to these studies (Table one).

Outcome measures

All of these xiv RCT studies reported hemoglobin levels, as their principal outcomes. While, iron markers such as levels of ferritin, serum fe, and transferrin saturation were measured as their secondary outcomes. Results are illustrated in Table 1.

Hazard of Bias cess

According to Figs. 2, 3, iv and five, the Cochrane risk of bias checklist shows the risk of bias in these randomized clinical trial studies [34]. We evaluated each variable: sequence generation (selection bias), allocating concealment (selection bias), blinding participants and personnel (operation bias), incomplete event data (compunction bias), and selective reporting (reporting bias). Each item with depression risk and appropriate information was marked equally (+), unclear risk and inadequate information marked every bit (?), high risk and unsuitable information marked as (−). Finally, we assessed the overall quality, ix RCTs had a low risk of bias rate (expert) [forty,41,42,43,44, 46, 47, 49,50,51,52,53]; two RCTs had a moderate risk of bias (fair) [45, 48].

Fig. ii
figure 2

Forest plot showing results of a meta-analysis on the effects of vitamin D supplementation on hemoglobin. Data were reported as SMDs with 95% CIs. (Toxqui study at four, 8, 12 and 16 weeks afterwards intervention, Panwar study at i, 4 and 6 weeks after supplementation)

Total size image

Fig. 3
figure 3

Woods plot showing results of a meta-analysis on the effects of vitamin D supplementation on ferritin. Information were reported as SMDs with 95% CIs. (Toxqui report at four, 8, 12 and 16 weeks after intervention, Panwar study at 1, 4 and half-dozen weeks afterwards supplementation)

Full size epitome

Fig. 4
figure 4

Forest plot showing results of a meta-assay on the furnishings of vitamin D supplementation on transferrin saturation. Information were reported as MDs with 95% CIs. (Toxqui study at 4, viii, 12 and 16 weeks after intervention, Panwar study at 1, 4 and 6 weeks after supplementation)

Full size image

Fig. 5
figure 5

Wood plot showing results of a meta-analysis on the effects of vitamin D supplementation on iron levels. Information were reported as SMDs with 95% CIs. (Toxqui study at 4, 8, 12 and sixteen weeks after intervention, Panwar study at 1, 4 and 6 weeks subsequently supplementation)

Full size paradigm

Meta-analyses

Outcomes

The remaining information from 3 studies examined differences in iron condition markers between intervention and control groups. Markers such as hemoglobin, ferritin, transferrin saturation (TS) and serum fe (SI) levels were included in the pooled analysis component.

Primary outcome

Overall effect of vitamin D on hemoglobin

Ten clinical trials (Due north = 1385) reported overall hemoglobin levels. When pooled analysis were performed, vitamin D assistants did non improve hemoglobin levels [SMD (95% CI) = 0.01 [− 0.28, 0.29]; p = 0.76; I2 = 82%; Phet < 0.00001]. Significant heterogeneity existed in the data. We categorized our information to seven groups based on participants' health condition. The subgroup analysis is demonstrated every bit pooled issue of vitamin D supplementation on hemoglobin in healthy adults 0.13 [95% CI = − 0.16, 0.42]; I2 = not applicable, bloodless patients 0.02 [95% CI = − 0.twenty, 0.24]; Iii = 30%, chronic kidney disease patients − 1.07 [95% CI = − 1.46, − 0.69]; Itwo = 0%, heart failure patients − 0.05 [95% CI = − 0.35, 0.25]; I2 = not applicable, hypertensive patients 0.00 [95% CI = − 0.29, 0.29]; I2 = not applicable, critically sick adults 3.85 [95% CI = 2.72, 4.98]; I2 = 0% and athletic subjects 0.15 [95% CI = − 0.xiii, 0.44]; I2 = 0% (Fig. 2).

Secondary effect

Overall effect of vitamin D on ferritin

In 11 of included studies (N = 1363) vitamin D supplementation did not amend ferritin concentrations in overall [SMD (95% CI) = − 0.01 [− 0.20, 0.18]; p = 0.91; I2 = 60%; Phet < 0.0010]. Significant heterogeneity existed in the information. For clarifying the bear on of vitamin D, subgroup analysis was performed in five groups. The subgroup analysis showed the pooled issue of vitamin D interventions on ferritin levels in healthy adults: -0.17 [95% CI = − 0.72, 0.39]; Itwo = 74%, anemic patients: -0.xviii [95% CI = − 0.36, 0.01]; I2 = 0%, chronic kidney affliction patients: 0.45 [95% CI = 0.06, 0.85]; Itwo = 58%, critically sick adults: -0.92 [95% CI = − 1.71, − 0.xiv]; Itwo = not applicative and athletic subjects: 0.09 [95% CI = − 0.61, 0.78]; Iii = 65% (Fig. 3).

Overall consequence of vitamin D on transferrin saturation

Pooled data of six studies (N = 1008) showed a significant difference between the case and control groups on transferrin saturation, with low heterogeneity [Dr. (95%CI): i.54 [0.31, 2.76]; p = 0.01; I2 = 21%; Phet =0.24] (Fig. four).

Overall effect of vitamin D on serum iron

The weighted results from four studies (North = 736) showed, an improving upshot of vitamin D on serum iron levels versus placebo grouping, without any existed heterogeneity [Physician (95%CI): 1.54 [0.31, 2.76]; p = 0.01; I2 = 0%; Phet =0.24] (Fig. v).

Sensitivity analysis and publication bias

Results of sensitivity analysis was conducted past using go out-one-out method, in this method removal of any of the studies from total RCTs or subgroups analysis could cause no substantial change in the impact of vitamin D supplements on hemoglobin and ferritin levels. For case, ii studies with measured hemoglobin and ferritin levels afterwards supplementation with vitamin D and a moderate quality were removed [45, 48]. Thus, the issue of vitamin D intervention did non significantly modify the overall outcome of hemoglobin levels: [SMD (95% CI) = 0.03 [− 0.27, 0.33]; p = 0.86; Iii = 84%; Phet < 0.00001], and ferritin levels: [SMD (95% CI) = 0.01 [− 0.xix, 0.21]; p = 0.92; I2 = 64%; Phet =0.0005]. Despite the weak asymmetry observed in funnel plot, electric current results showed that vitamin D supplementation effects on hemoglobin concentrations, had no evidence of publication bias (Begg'southward test, P = 0.58; Egger'south test, P = 0.92) [37, 54].

Give-and-take

The present systematic and meta-analysis study included 14 studies with 1385 participants from different countries. Vitamin D3 treatments (xx to 500,000 IU) on adults did non have a significant bear on on the levels of serum hemoglobin overall. While, pooled analysis revealed a significant consequence of vitamin D supplements on transferrin saturation and iron levels. Subgroup assay co-ordinate to the health condition of participants, propose that supplementation with vitamin D significantly increased hemoglobin levels in critically ill patients. Sensitivity analysis for studies with depression quality indicated an insignificant change on the total effect. To the extent of our cognition, this is the commencement pooled analysis which has evaluated the overall effect of vitamin D interventions on iron status in subjects with unlike health conditions. According to a cross sectional meta-analysis, there was a positive association between vitamin D deficiency and incidence of anemia [55]. This study, was performed on 5183 subjects, indicated participants who were vitamin D deficient had 64% higher risk of developing anemia compared to those who were vitamin D sufficient [55]. In some other meta-analysis by Basutkar et al. [56], .vitamin D supplementation in iron insufficient subjects did not better their clinical outcomes such as hemoglobin and ferritin levels. Similarly, the clinical trials reported in the present systematic review, showed no significant impact of unlike doses of vitamin D on hemoglobin and ferritin levels, thus, this could be due to the high heterogeneity of the combined studies [twoscore, 42,43,44,45,46, 49,l,51, 53]. Withal, it should exist noted that active form of vitamin D tin touch on erythropoiesis through stimulating the erythroid progenitor cells for proliferation and maturation, therefore calcitriol deficiency may harm erythropoiesis, and this may explain positive effect of vitamin D on iron status [57]. Our principal finding is consistent with a recent meta-analysis, where they showed vitamin D treatment had no association with improvements in patients with anemia [45, 46]. However, according to a narrative review conducted by Smith et al. [58], .cholecalciferol supplementation improved anemic condition, through modulating pro and anti-inflammatory cytokines, which leads to reduction in the levels of hepcidin and progress into anemic status [58]. Finally, vitamin D may heave erythropoiesis by increase in iron availability. Some iron inhibitor recycling agents, including the parathyroid hormone (PTH) and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) may lead to destructive effects on iron metabolism. However, iron recycling effect of vitamin D probably depends on several weather condition such as existed inflammation, loftier levels of parathyroid hormone and fibroblast growth factor 23 [29, 59]. Notably, in healthy subjects due to their balanced levels of parathyroid hormones and Fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23), likewise no or low inflammation charge per unit, vitamin D could non exist effective for improving the atomic number 26 status. However, co-ordinate to the subgroup analysis, in critically ill patients with loftier inflammation rate and loftier PTH concentrations, vitamin D may meliorate their iron status through increment in erythropoietin and stimulation of erythroid progenitor formation while, PTH levels are suppressed. In this study, current outcomes suggest that vitamin D interventions significantly induce transferrin saturation and iron levels. Active vitamin D (1, 25(OH) D3) may have beneficial impacts on the levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH), through increase in the absorption rate of calcium and suppression in the release of PTH from parathyroid glands [60]. Previous studies accept proposed that depletion of PTH secretion could be related to improved erythropoiesis past inducing erythropoietin and erythroid progenitor formation also as decreased fibrosis of the os marrow [29, 61, 62]. Moreover, since fibroblast growth factor 23 is a negative modulator for iron hemostasis and erythropoiesis, vitamin D may reduce this factor thus improve the metabolism of iron, followed past an increase in the levels of iron [63, 64]. The present meta-analysis has several limitations, duration of RCTs were curt, also one of the included RCTs was not assessed in the pooled analysis since information technology lacked placebo grouping [65]. Dissimilar types of vitamin D such as ergocalciferol and calcitriol were supplemented in these trials [41, 43]. The possible reasons for the heterogeneity in data could be associated with the differences in the duration of supplementation, sex, race, geographical location, seasonal alter, mean historic period, sample size, health conditions, vitamin D dosage and co-supplementations. Therefore, we performed the random-effects model, in order to determine the heterogeneity among these studies. This study lacks bear witness regarding the mechanism of action between vitamin D and iron levels.

Conclusion

In decision, current systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that vitamin D supplements can meliorate hemoglobin and ferritin status in critically ill and chronic kidney disease patients' subgroups. Whereas in other subgroups (healthy adults, anemic patients, chronic kidney illness patients, center failure patients, hypertensive patients, critically ill patients and athletes) not-statistically significant difference were observed on hemoglobin and ferritin levels. The current study suggests that vitamin D supplementation on inflammatory diseases (CKD and disquisitional illness) could effectively ameliorate anemia status. Although at that place is still limited show in club to support and clarify the verbal machinery of action betwixt vitamin D and iron levels. Therefore, farther high-quality, well designed and long term RCTs in this field are extensively required.

Availability of data and materials

Please contact author for data requests.

Change history

  • 05 March 2021

    A Correction to this newspaper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-021-00679-iv

Abbreviations

CHD:

Chronic heart illness

CIs:

Confidence intervals

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

EPO:

Erythropoietin

FGF23:

Fibroblast grows factor 23

Hb:

Hemoglobin concentration

MeSH:

Medical subject headings

PICOS:

The Participants, Interventions, Comparisons, Outcomes, and Study Design Approach

PRISMA:

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

PTH:

Parathyroid hormone

RCTs:

Randomized controlled trials

TIBC:

Full fe binding capacity

WHO:

World Wellness System

WMD:

Weighted hateful departure

References

  1. De Benoist B, McLean Eastward, Egli I, Cogswell Chiliad. Worldwide prevalence of anaemia 1993-2005. WHO global database on anaemia Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008. Nutr Clin Pract. 2008;23(2):128–41.

    Google Scholar

  2. Kassebaum NJ, Jasrasaria R, Naghavi Grand, Wulf SK, Johns Northward, Lozano R, et al. A systematic analysis of global anemia brunt from 1990 to 2010. Claret. 2014;123(5):615–24.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Cardinal  Google Scholar

  3. Zimmermann MB, Hurrell RF. Nutritional iron deficiency. Lancet. 2007;370(9586):511–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  4. Clark SF. Iron deficiency anemia: diagnosis and management. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2009;25(2):122–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  5. Hershko C, Hoffbrand AV, Keret D, Souroujon Thou, Maschler I, Monselise Y, et al. Part of autoimmune gastritis, Helicobacter pylori and celiac disease in refractory or unexplained iron deficiency anemia. Haematologica. 2005;ninety(5):585–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  6. Corazza Thou, Valentini R, Andreani M, D'anchino M, Leva M, Ginaldi L, et al. Subclinical coeliac illness is a frequent cause of iron-deficiency anaemia. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1995;30(2):153–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  7. Kulnigg S, Gasche C. Systematic review: managing anaemia in Crohn'south affliction. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24(11–12):1507–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar

  8. Gasche C. Anemia in IBD: the overlooked villain. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2000;six(2):142–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  9. De Nicola L, Minutolo R, Chiodini P, Zamboli P, Cianciaruso B, Nappi F, et al. Prevalence and prognosis of mild anemia in non-dialysis chronic kidney affliction: a prospective accomplice study in outpatient renal clinics. Am J Nephrol. 2010;32(6):533–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar

  10. Minutolo R, Locatelli F, Gallieni M, Bonofiglio R, Fuiano M, Oldrizzi Fifty, et al. Anaemia direction in non-dialysis chronic kidney affliction (CKD) patients: a multicentre prospective report in renal clinics. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28(12):3035–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  11. Baribeault D, Auerbach M. Iron replacement therapy in cancer-related anemia. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2011;68(10 Supplement 1):S4–S14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  12. Jankowska EA, Rozentryt P, Witkowska A, Nowak J, Hartmann O, Ponikowska B, et al. Iron deficiency: an ominous sign in patients with systolic chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(xv):1872–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  13. Klip IT, Comin-Colet J, Voors AA, Ponikowski P, Enjuanes C, Banasiak W, et al. Atomic number 26 deficiency in chronic heart failure: an international pooled assay. Am Eye J. 2013;165(4):575–82. e3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  14. Allen RP, Auerbach Due south, Bahrain H, Auerbach M, Earley CJ. The prevalence and touch of restless legs syndrome on patients with iron deficiency anemia. Am J Hematol. 2013;88(4):261–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar

  15. Wang J, O'Reilly B, Venkataraman R, Mysliwiec V, Mysliwiec A. Efficacy of oral iron in patients with restless legs syndrome and a low-normal ferritin: a randomized, double-bullheaded, placebo-controlled study. Sleep Med. 2009;x(ix):973–five.

    PubMed  Google Scholar

  16. Evstatiev R, Marteau P, Iqbal T, Khalif IL, Stein J, Bokemeyer B, et al. FERGIcor, a randomized controlled trial on ferric carboxymaltose for iron deficiency anemia in inflammatory bowel illness. Gastroenterology. 2011;141(3):846–53. e2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  17. Verdon F, Burnand B, Stubi CF, Bonard C, Graff Yard, Michaud A, et al. Atomic number 26 supplementation for unexplained fatigue in non-anaemic women: double bullheaded randomised placebo controlled trial. Bmj. 2003;326(7399):1124.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Key  Google Scholar

  18. Falkingham M, Abdelhamid A, Curtis P, Fairweather-Tait S, Dye L, Hooper 50. The effects of oral iron supplementation on noesis in older children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr J. 2010;9(ane):four.

    PubMed  PubMed Fundamental  Google Scholar

  19. Goddard A, McIntyre AS, Scott BB. Guidelines for the management of iron deficiency anaemia. Gut. 2000;46(suppl 4):iv1–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

  20. Holick MF. Vitamin D: extraskeletal health. Rheum Dis Clin. 2012;38(1):141–sixty.

    Google Scholar

  21. Bahrami LS, Jandaghi SHSS, Janani L, Pahlavan M, Arabi SM, Sadeghi H, et al. Vitamin D supplementation and serum oestrus shock protein lx levels in patients with coronary heart disease: a randomized clinical trial. Nutr Metab. 2018;15(1):56.

    Google Scholar

  22. Baeke F, Gysemans C, Korf H, Mathieu C. Vitamin D insufficiency: implications for the allowed arrangement. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010;25(9):1597–606.

    PubMed  Google Scholar

  23. Adams JS, Hewison G. Unexpected actions of vitamin D: new perspectives on the regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2008;4(ii):80.

    CAS  Google Scholar

  24. Blazsek I, Farabos C, Quittet P, Labat M-Fifty, Bringuier AF, Triana BK, et al. Os marrow stromal jail cell defects and one alpha, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 deficiency underlying homo myeloid leukemias. Cancer Detect Prev. 1996;20(1):31–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  25. Lucisano S, Di Mauro E, Montalto Yard, Cernaro Five, Buemi 1000, Santoro D. Vitamin D and anemia. J Ren Nutr. 2014;24(1):61–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  26. Sim JJ, Lac PT, Liu ILA, Meguerditchian SO, Kumar VA, Kujubu DA, et al. Vitamin D deficiency and anemia: a cantankerous-sectional study. Ann Hematol. 2010;89(five):447–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  27. Perlstein TS, Pande R, Berliner N, Vanasse GJ. Prevalence of 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency in subgroups of elderly persons with anemia: association with anemia of inflammation. Blood. 2011. https://doi.org/x.1182/blood-2010-09-309708.

  28. Yoo Due east-H, Cho H-J. Prevalence of 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency in Korean patients with anemia. Am Soc Hematol. 2012;120(21):5164.

  29. Icardi A, Paoletti E, De Nicola L, Mazzaferro Due south, Russo R, Cozzolino Thou. Renal anaemia and EPO hyporesponsiveness associated with vitamin D deficiency: the potential role of inflammation. Nephrol Punch Transplant. 2013;28(7):1672–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  30. Zughaier SM, Alvarez JA, Sloan JH, Konrad RJ, Tangpricha V. The role of vitamin D in regulating the iron-hepcidin-ferroportin axis in monocytes. J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2014;i(ane):e19–25.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

  31. Stewart LA, Clarke M, Rovers M, Riley RD, Simmonds 1000, Stewart G, et al. Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of private participant information: the PRISMA-IPD statement. Jama. 2015;313(16):1657–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar

  32. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;half dozen(7):e1000100.

    PubMed  PubMed Fundamental  Google Scholar

  33. O'Connor D, Green South, Higgins JP. Defining the review question and developing criteria for including studies, Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Cochrane book serial; 2008. p. 81–94.

    Google Scholar

  34. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.i. 0. The Cochrane Collaboration website; 2009.

    Google Scholar

  35. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-assay in clinical trials. Command Clin Trials. 1986;7(three):177–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  36. DerSimonian R, Laird Northward. Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;45:139–45.

    PubMed  PubMed Primal  Google Scholar

  37. Egger One thousand, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Bmj. 1997;315(7109):629–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

  38. Egger M, Davey-Smith K, Altman D. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. BMJ. 2007.

  39. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Bmj. 2003;327(7414):557–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

  40. Hennigar SR, Gaffney-Stomberg E, Lutz LJ, Cable SJ, Pasiakos SM, Young AJ, et al. Consumption of a calcium and vitamin D-fortified food product does not affect iron status during initial war machine preparation: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Br J Nutr. 2016;115(4):637–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  41. Miskulin DC, Majchrzak M, Tighiouart H, Muther RS, Kapoian T, Johnson DS, et al. Ergocalciferol supplementation in hemodialysis patients with vitamin D deficiency: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(half-dozen):1801–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  42. Madar AA, Stene LC, Meyer HE, Brekke M, Lagerløv P, Knutsen KV. Effect of vitamin D 3 supplementation on iron status: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial amid indigenous minorities living in Norway. Nutr J. 2015;15(1):74.

    Google Scholar

  43. Panwar B, McCann D, Olbina G, Westerman K, Gutiérrez OM. Effect of calcitriol on serum hepcidin in individuals with chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19(1):35.

    PubMed  PubMed Cardinal  Google Scholar

  44. Smith EM, Alvarez JA, Kearns Medico, Hao Fifty, Sloan JH, Konrad RJ, et al. High-dose vitamin D3 reduces circulating hepcidin concentrations: a pilot, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in healthy adults. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(4):980–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  45. Sooragonda B, Bhadada SK, Shah VN, Malhotra P, Ahluwalia J, Sachdeva N. Effect of vitamin D replacement on hemoglobin concentration in subjects with concurrent iron-deficiency anemia and vitamin D deficiency: a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Acta Haematol. 2015;133(i):31–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  46. Toxqui Fifty, Pérez-Granados AM, Blanco-Rojo R, Wright I, González-Vizcayno C, Vaquero MP. Effects of an fe or iron and vitamin D–fortified flavored skim milk on iron metabolism: a randomized controlled double-blind trial in iron-deficient women. J Am Coll Nutr. 2013;32(5):312–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  47. Trautvetter U, Neef N, Leiterer M, Kiehntopf 1000, Kratzsch J, Jahreis G. Outcome of calcium phosphate and vitamin D three supplementation on os remodelling and metabolism of calcium, phosphorus, magnesium and fe. Nutr J. 2014;13(one):6.

    PubMed  PubMed Cardinal  Google Scholar

  48. Dahlquist DT, Stellingwerff T, Dieter BP, McKenzie DC, Koehle MS. Furnishings of macro-and micronutrients on exercise-induced hepcidin response in highly trained endurance athletes. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2017;42(10):1036–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  49. Ernst J, Prokop S, Fuchs U, Dreier J, Kuhn J, Knabbe C, et al. Randomized supplementation of 4000 IU vitamin D 3 daily vs placebo on the prevalence of anemia in avant-garde heart failure: the EVITA trial. Nutr J. 2017;16(1):49.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Primal  Google Scholar

  50. Ernst JB, Tomaschitz A, Grübler MR, Gaksch M, Kienreich K, Verheyen N, et al. Vitamin D supplementation and hemoglobin levels in hypertensive patients: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Endocrinol. 2016;2016:6836402.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

  51. Jastrzebska Thou, Kaczmarczyk M, Suárez AD, Sánchez GFL, Jastrzebska J, Radziminski 50, et al. Iron, hematological parameters and blood plasma lipid profile in vitamin D supplemented and not-supplemented immature soccer players subjected to loftier-intensity interval grooming. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol. 2017;63(6):357–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  52. Walentukiewicz A, Lysak-Radomska A, Jaworska J, Prusik K, Prusik K, Kortas J, et al. Vitamin D supplementation and Nordic walking training decreases serum homocysteine and ferritin in elderly women. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;fifteen(ten):2064.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

  53. Smith EM, Jones JL, Han JE, Alvarez JA, Sloan JH, Konrad RJ, et al. High-dose vitamin D3 administration is associated with increases in hemoglobin concentrations in mechanically ventilated critically sick adults: a pilot double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2018;42(one):87–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar

  54. Begg CB, Mazumdar Chiliad. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation exam for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50:1088–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  55. Liu T, Zhong S, Liu L, Liu S, Li X, Zhou T, et al. Vitamin D deficiency and the hazard of anemia: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Ren Fail. 2015;37(vi):929–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  56. Basutkar RS, Tsundue T, Siva H, Rose A, Ponnusankar S, Mishra South, et al. Vitamin D supplementation in patients with fe deficiency Anaemia: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Syst Rev Pharm. 2018;ane:172–four.

    Google Scholar

  57. Alon DB, Chaimovitz C, Dvilansky A, Lugassy G, Douvdevani A, Shany Due south, et al. Novel role of 1, 25 (OH) 2D3 in induction of erythroid progenitor cell proliferation. Exp Hematol. 2002;30(5):403–ix.

    PubMed  Google Scholar

  58. Smith EM, Tangpricha 5. Vitamin D and anemia: insights into an emerging association. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2015;22(half-dozen):432.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Cardinal  Google Scholar

  59. Madathil SV, Coe LM, Casu C, Sitara D. Klotho deficiency disrupts hematopoietic stalk cell development and erythropoiesis. Am J Pathol. 2014;184(three):827–41.

    Google Scholar

  60. Russo D, Morrone L, Di Iorio B, Andreucci M, De Gregorio MG, Errichiello C, et al. Parathyroid hormone may be an early predictor of depression serum hemoglobin concentration in patients with not advanced stages of chronic kidney illness. J Nephrol. 2015;28(6):701–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  61. Bhadada SK, Bhansali A, Ahluwalia J, Chanukya G, Behera A, Dutta P. Anaemia and marrow fibrosis in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism before and after curative parathyroidectomy. Clin Endocrinol. 2009;seventy(iv):527–32.

    Google Scholar

  62. Rao DS, Shih M-S, Mohini R. Outcome of serum parathyroid hormone and bone marrow fibrosis on the response to erythropoietin in uremia. Northward Engl J Med. 1993;328(3):171–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  63. Scialla JJ, Wolf M. Roles of phosphate and fibroblast growth factor 23 in cardiovascular illness. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2014;10(five):268.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  64. Coe LM, Madathil SV, Casu C, Lanske B, Rivella S, Sitara D. FGF-23 is a negative regulator of prenatal and postnatal erythropoiesis. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(14):9795–810.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Key  Google Scholar

  65. Riccio Due east, Sabbatini Chiliad, Bruzzese D, Capuano I, Migliaccio South, Andreucci M, et al. Consequence of paricalcitol vs calcitriol on hemoglobin levels in chronic kidney disease patients: a randomized trial. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0118174.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

All authors were fully responsible for the validity and reliability of the data, the assay and the writing of the manuscript.

Author data

Affiliations

Contributions

SMA and LSB conducted search terms on databases. AN, MV and GR assessed the quality of studies. SMA designed the manuscript. LSB revised and GR edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Respective author

Correspondence to Abdolreza Norouzy.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicative.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they take no competing interests.

Boosted information

Publisher's Notation

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open up Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in whatsoever medium, provided you requite appropriate credit to the original writer(southward) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were fabricated. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/cipher/ane.0/) applies to the data made bachelor in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

Most this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arabi, S.M., Ranjbar, G., Bahrami, L.S. et al. The outcome of vitamin D supplementation on hemoglobin concentration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr J 19, xi (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-020-0526-three

Download commendation

  • Received:

  • Accustomed:

  • Published:

  • DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-020-0526-3

Keywords

  • Anemia
  • Hemoglobin
  • Vitamin D
  • Fe status
  • RCT

ruleynowild.blogspot.com

Source: https://nutritionj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12937-020-0526-3

0 Response to "68 Year Old Male With 12.5 Hemoglobin Reading"

Enviar um comentário

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel